Related Articles
We live in an age deeply marked by democracy. We are accustomed to voting for representatives, approving laws by majority vote, consulting opinions, and considering that, in principle, every question can be subjected to collective deliberation.
This way of organizing civil life may have its legitimacy within the political order. But there is a danger when we transfer that logic, without qualification, to the realm of Divine Revelation: the temptation to think that revealed truth can also be modified, redefined, or approved by majority vote.
And here a decisive question arises for correctly understanding synodality: the Church listens, discerns, dialogues, and walks together, but she is not the owner of Revelation.
The Catholic faith did not originate in a vote.
The Creed was not approved because a majority of Christians considered it convenient to believe in the Trinity. The divinity of Christ does not depend on a poll. The reality of the Resurrection is not open to a popular consultation. The indissolubility of marriage, the reality of sin, the necessity of grace, the dignity of human life, or the sacramental nature of the Church are not questions that can be resolved through a simple tally of opinions.
The Church receives a Deposit of Faith which she must safeguard, transmit, explain, and defend.
The Catechism teaches that bishops, in communion with the Pope, have precisely the duty to proclaim the Gospel faithfully and authoritatively, as authentic witnesses to the apostolic faith and vested with Christ’s authority.
This affirmation is especially important in our time because there is a growing confusion between listening to the People of God and attributing to the People of God the capacity to constitute revealed truth.
These are completely different things.
1. Christ Did Not Found a Parliamentary Assembly
To understand the role of the hierarchy, we must begin with Christ.
Jesus did not simply leave behind a collection of teachings for subsequent generations to reinterpret according to their cultural needs. He founded a Church and entrusted specific men with a specific mission.
To Peter He said:
“You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church” (Mt 16:18).
And He added:
“I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Mt 16:19).
We do not find here the model of a community in which doctrine is decided by voting.
We find a Church built upon Christ, with an apostolic and pastoral structure.
Jesus also said to the Apostles:
“Whoever listens to you listens to me” (Lk 10:16).
And after the Resurrection, when He sent them forth, He declared:
“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations […] teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19–20).
The expression is extraordinarily significant: “all that I have commanded you.”
The Apostles were not given authorization to decide which commandments would remain valid according to the preferences of each age. They received the mandate to transmit what they had received.
This is why the Church is not the owner of Revelation. She is its custodian.
2. What Exactly Is the Deposit of Faith?
The term may sound abstract, but the idea is simple.
The Deposit of Faith is the entirety of what God has revealed for our salvation and entrusted to the Church so that it may be preserved and transmitted.
Saint Paul uses precisely the language of a deposit when he exhorts Timothy:
“Guard the good deposit entrusted to you” (2 Tim 1:14).
And again:
“Guard what has been entrusted to you” (1 Tim 6:20).
He does not say: “Modify the deposit when circumstances change.”
He does not say: “Submit the deposit to a vote.”
He says: “Guard it.”
The mission of the Magisterium arises precisely from this.
The Catechism teaches that the authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether written or handed on, has been entrusted to the living Magisterium of the Church, exercised by the bishops in communion with the Successor of Peter. And it adds something fundamental: the Magisterium is not above the Word of God, but serves it.
This distinction is fundamental.
The Pope is not the owner of truth.
The bishop is not the owner of truth.
A council is not the owner of truth.
A bishops’ conference is not the owner of truth.
And neither is the entire body of the faithful.
Truth belongs to God.
The Church is called to serve it.
3. The Hierarchy Is Not a Human Invention
One of the confusions of our time consists in presenting the ecclesial hierarchy as though it were simply a historical structure that arose for administrative reasons.
From the Catholic perspective, this is insufficient.
Christ chose the Apostles, entrusted them with authority, and established in them a ministry destined to continue in the Church.
The Catechism explains that Christ chose the Apostles and made them participants in His mission and authority, and that after His Ascension He continues to guide His Church through pastors who continue His work. Bishops are the successors of the Apostles.
Therefore, the hierarchy is not simply a religious bureaucracy.
A bishop is not merely a “manager” of a community.
A priest is not merely an activity coordinator.
The Pope is not simply the president of an international association.
There is a much deeper sacramental and theological reality.
The ordained ministry participates in Christ’s mission and has a threefold dimension: teaching, sanctifying, and governing.
Hence episcopal authority carries a particularly grave responsibility: to safeguard the faith that has been received.
4. Listening Does Not Mean Putting Truth to a Vote
Here we find the heart of the problem.
Synodality can and should involve listening.
The Church should listen to the experiences of the faithful.
She should listen to families.
She should listen to young people.
She should listen to priests.
She should listen to those who suffer.
She should even listen to difficult questions and objections that may help us better understand particular situations.
But listening does not necessarily mean accepting.
And discerning does not necessarily mean approving.
A Church that listens can say:
“We understand your suffering, but this doctrine cannot be changed.”
She can say:
“We understand your difficulty, but revealed truth does not depend on our difficulty in accepting it.”
She can say:
“Your experience deserves pastoral accompaniment, but an individual experience cannot automatically become a new universal moral norm.”
This distinction is essential.
Pastoral ministry must begin with truth, not replace it.
5. The Danger of Democratizing Dogma
Let us imagine for a moment that dogma functioned democratically.
Suppose that a particular doctrine received 51% of the votes today and only 49% tomorrow.
Would truth have changed?
Obviously not.
The majority can be mistaken.
Human unanimity can also be mistaken.
Public opinion can be mistaken.
Entire communities can fall into error.
History demonstrates this constantly.
Revealed truth has a different nature because its origin is not human opinion but God.
For this reason, Catholic doctrine radically distinguishes between the government of a political community and the safeguarding of Revelation.
In politics, there can be a legitimate majority.
In doctrine, a majority does not turn error into truth.
In morality, popularity does not turn a morally disordered act into a good one.
In dogma, a vote does not turn a human opinion into Revelation.
6. Councils Do Not “Invent” the Truth Either
The history of the Church offers a magnificent example.
The great ecumenical councils did not meet to decide which version of Christianity the majority preferred.
The Council of Nicaea, for example, did not “invent” the divinity of Christ.
The divinity of Christ already belonged to the apostolic faith.
The Council had to defend and formulate with precision what the Church had already received.
The same applies to other great doctrinal moments in the history of the Church.
The Church develops her language, deepens her understanding, responds to heresies, distinguishes concepts, and formulates increasingly precise definitions.
But an authentic dogmatic definition does not create a new truth.
It makes explicit and safeguards a truth that has been received.
This explains how doctrine can develop without changing its meaning.
Authentic development is like contemplating a reality from different perspectives: we can understand it better without turning it into something else.
7. What About the “Sense of Faith” of the Faithful?
Here we must avoid another extreme.
Defending the hierarchy does not mean despising the People of God.
Every baptized person is called to holiness and participates, according to his or her condition, in Christ’s mission. The Catechism recognizes a genuine equality in dignity among all the faithful and states that each person participates, according to his or her own vocation, in the Church’s mission.
Furthermore, there is the sensus fidei, the supernatural sense of faith.
The Holy Spirit acts throughout the Church.
But this does not mean that every individual opinion can automatically be presented as a manifestation of the Holy Spirit.
The sensus fidei does not mean:
“I think this, therefore the Holy Spirit has revealed it to me.”
Nor does it mean:
“The majority of Catholics consider this conduct acceptable, therefore the Church must declare it morally good.”
The sense of faith is profoundly connected with the life of grace, fidelity to the Gospel, apostolic Tradition, and communion with the Magisterium.
The People of God are not opposed to the Magisterium as though they were two political powers.
The Church is one body.
8. Authentic Catholic Synodality Does Not Eliminate the Hierarchy
The word “synodality” comes from an ancient reality of the Church: walking together.
And walking together is profoundly Catholic.
But walking together does not mean that everyone performs the same function.
In a family, everyone can participate in family life, but not everyone exercises the same responsibility.
In a body, every member is important, but not every member performs the same function.
Saint Paul explains it clearly:
“For just as the body is one and has many members […] so it is with Christ” (1 Cor 12:12).
The Church needs a diversity of charisms, ministries, and responsibilities.
Therefore, properly understood, synodality should not become a democratization of the sacramental structure of the Church.
Participation does not eliminate authority.
Listening does not eliminate teaching.
Dialogue does not eliminate truth.
Discernment does not eliminate Revelation.
9. A Bishop Cannot Limit Himself to Being the Spokesman for His Diocese’s Opinion
This point has enormous pastoral consequences.
A bishop does not receive his mission by continually asking:
“What does my diocese want me to teach?”
His fundamental question should be:
“What has Christ entrusted to me, and how must I transmit it faithfully?”
Bishops have the duty to teach the faith authentically and to govern their particular Churches pastorally, in communion with the Pope and with the whole Church.
This requires courage.
At times a pastor will have to teach something that is unpopular.
At times he will have to recall a doctrine that is uncomfortable.
At times he will have to challenge a cultural tendency.
At times he will have to say “no.”
And that “no” can itself be an act of pastoral charity.
Because a doctor does not love the sick person by telling him only what he wants to hear.
A father does not love his child by never correcting him.
And a shepherd does not love the flock when he sacrifices truth simply to avoid conflict.
10. Mercy Needs Truth
One of the great temptations of our time is to place mercy and truth in opposition.
As though telling the truth were a lack of mercy.
As though defending an objective moral norm were a lack of compassion.
But Christianity has never understood mercy as the abolition of truth.
Christ forgives the woman caught in sin, but He also tells her:
“Go, and from now on do not sin again” (Jn 8:11).
There is mercy.
But there is also conversion.
There is welcome.
But there is also truth.
There is forgiveness.
But there is also a call to change one’s life.
Catholic pastoral ministry must maintain both dimensions.
Pastoral ministry without truth ultimately becomes sentimentalism.
Truth without charity can become harshness.
But the solution is not to sacrifice truth.
The solution is to proclaim truth with charity.
11. Morality Cannot Be Submitted to Polls Either
The same issue appears in the moral sphere.
Our age often frames questions in this way:
“What does society think?”
“What does the majority think?”
“What does our generation consider normal?”
“What do young people think?”
But the Christian question is different:
“What does God teach?”
Christian morality does not depend on social trends.
If tomorrow a society considered a particular behavior acceptable, even if that behavior were objectively contrary to the moral law, that behavior would not automatically become good.
And if a society rejected a moral truth, that truth would not cease to be true because of it.
The Church has no authority to declare good what God has revealed to be evil.
Likewise, she has no authority to declare evil what God has established as good.
Her authority is ministerial.
She safeguards what she has received.
12. Catholic Obedience Is Not Blind Obedience
This point also requires precision.
Defending the authority of the Pope and bishops does not mean claiming that every word spoken by every member of the hierarchy is automatically infallible.
The Church carefully distinguishes between different levels of teaching.
The Catechism states that infallibility is exercised, among other cases, when the Roman Pontiff or the college of bishops in communion with him proclaim, through a definitive act, a doctrine of faith or morals, and also when there is an ordinary and universal teaching proposed as definitive.
Furthermore, even when a teaching is not proposed in a definitive manner, there remains an obligation of religious submission to the authentic Magisterium.
Therefore, the serious Catholic position is not:
“The Pope is always infallible about everything.”
That would be false.
But neither is it:
“Every Catholic may freely accept or reject any teaching according to personal opinion.”
That does not correspond to Catholic doctrine either.
The true Catholic attitude lies between both errors: faith, obedience, prudence, study, and respect for the legitimate authority of the Church.
13. The Real Problem Is Not That the Church Listens Too Much
At times synodality is criticized as though listening to the People of God were inherently dangerous.
It is not.
The Church has always listened.
The Apostles listened to the communities.
The Fathers of the Church engaged in dialogue.
The councils debated.
Theologians argued.
The saints raised difficult questions.
Catholic tradition has never been a tradition of superficial thinking.
The problem arises when listening is confused with doctrinal sovereignty.
The Church can ask:
“How are you living this teaching?”
But that does not mean:
“Do you want this teaching to remain true?”
She can ask:
“What pastoral difficulties are you experiencing?”
But not:
“What doctrine do you want the Church to have?”
The first attitude is pastoral.
The second would turn Revelation into a consumer product.
14. What Does This Mean for the Ordinary Catholic?
It has very concrete consequences.
First: we must not build our faith on polls.
Second: we must not turn social media into a parallel magisterium.
Third: we must not think that an opinion repeated thousands of times thereby becomes Catholic doctrine.
Fourth: we must know the Catechism and the official teaching of the Church.
Fifth: we must learn to distinguish between a theological opinion, a pastoral discipline, a magisterial teaching, and a dogma.
And sixth: we must pray for our pastors.
Because defending the authority of the Church does not mean idealizing every bishop or priest.
Pastors remain human beings capable of making mistakes in prudential opinions, committing sins, and acting wrongly in particular circumstances.
But Christ did not promise that every pastor would be personally perfect.
He promised something much more important: that His Church would not be abandoned.
“I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Mt 28:20).
15. The Church Does Not Need Doctrinal Democracy; She Needs Saints
Perhaps this is the most important pastoral conclusion.
The great crisis facing the Church today will not be solved simply through more meetings.
Nor through more voting.
Nor through polls.
Nor through digital campaigns.
Nor through wars between “progressives” and “traditionalists.”
The Church needs holy men and women.
She needs priests who deeply love Christ.
She needs bishops with the courage to teach.
She needs well-formed lay faithful.
She needs Christian families.
She needs young people who know the Gospel.
She needs Catholics capable of distinguishing the voice of Christ from the noise of social media.
And she needs to recover an elementary conviction:
truth is not manufactured; it is received.
Conclusion: Walking Together, Yes; Voting on Revelation, No
The Church can walk synodally.
She must listen.
She must dialogue.
She must discern.
She must accompany.
She must seek the best pastoral responses to the challenges of every age.
But there is a boundary she cannot cross:
the Church cannot become the author of what she received as Revelation.
Authentic Catholic synodality does not consist in replacing the Magisterium with a deliberative assembly or in transforming doctrine into a permanent referendum.
Christ founded a Church.
He gave her a mission.
He constituted Apostles.
He gave them authority.
He promised to assist them with the Holy Spirit.
And He entrusted their successors with the responsibility of safeguarding the deposit they had received.
Therefore, the authority of the hierarchy should not be understood as an obstacle to synodality, but as a guarantee that walking together does not ultimately lead us away from Christ.
Because walking together does not mean that everyone has the authority to change the path.
The Church is not called to ask what truth the majority wants.
She is called to ask what truth she received from her Lord.
We are not the ones who judge the Gospel.
It is the Gospel that judges our age.
We are not the ones who choose which of Christ’s commandments to preserve.
We are the ones called to conversion and obedience.
Nor can the bishop, the priest, the theologian, the layperson, the council, or the Pope arbitrarily dispose of Revelation as though it were personal property.
The Magisterium exists precisely to serve it.
The hierarchy exists to safeguard it.
The sacraments exist to communicate Christ’s grace.
Tradition exists to transmit what has been received.
And the People of God exist to live, celebrate, profess, and proclaim that faith.
Therefore, faced with the temptation to democratize dogma and turn Christian morality into a matter of majorities, the Catholic can calmly remember the words of Saint Paul:
“For we preach not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord” (2 Cor 4:5).
There lies the key.
We do not preach ourselves.
We do not preach our preferences.
We do not preach the fashions of a generation.
We do not preach the majority opinion.
We preach Christ.
And when the Church is truly faithful to her mission, she does not change the truth to adapt it to the world.
She does something far more difficult and far more beautiful:
she helps the world convert to the truth.
The Church can change her pastoral methods.
She can improve her language.
She can study new realities.
She can deepen her understanding.
She can listen to new questions.
She can find new ways of evangelizing.
But there is one thing she can never do:
turn God’s Revelation into a matter submitted to the ballot box.
Because truth does not derive its authority from our votes.
Truth has authority because it comes from God.
And the mission of the Church is not to decide which truth she wants to have.
It is to remain faithful to the truth that her Lord entrusted to her.
