Related Articles
All truth, even painful truth, sets us free. (cf. Jn 8:32)
Introduction: When “forever” breaks
In a world that moves faster every day, where promises fade and human relationships grow fragile, marriage often finds itself caught in a storm. The longing for faithful, stable, and fruitful love remains alive in the human heart, but reality shows that many marriages end in separation, divorce, and confusion.
In this landscape, the Catholic Church does not close its eyes nor harden its heart. On the contrary, it offers a light that, far from judging, seeks to heal: the possibility of declaring a marriage null. But what does that really mean? Isn’t that just a “Catholic divorce”? How can fidelity to the Gospel be reconciled with compassion for those whose marriages have failed? What does Church Tradition say? And what can the faithful do when facing such situations?
This article aims to be a compass: clear, deep, theologically faithful, and pastorally close. A guide so that truth may not become a burden, but a path to freedom.
1. What is marriage nullity? An essential definition
Marriage nullity is the official recognition by an ecclesiastical tribunal that a marriage was not valid from the beginning, even though it may have appeared to be. In other words, it is not that the bond is broken, but that it never truly existed in the sacramental order due to the absence of essential elements of Christian marriage.
“What God has joined together, let no man separate” (Mk 10:9).
But what if God never joined it, even if it seemed so?
Difference between nullity and divorce
- Divorce: breaks a valid marriage bond. It has no effect in the sacramental realm.
- Nullity: declares that a true sacramental marriage never existed, due to defects in consent, impediments, lack of canonical form, etc.
2. Theological foundation: Why can the Church declare a marriage null?
Marriage as a Sacrament
Marriage is not simply a human contract or a stable cohabitation: it is a sacrament instituted by Christ, a reflection of the union between Christ and His Church (Eph 5:25-32). Like every sacrament, it requires matter, form, and proper intention.
Essential elements for a valid marriage:
- Free and full consent from both parties.
- Absence of diriment impediments (such as being already married, permanent impotence, etc.).
- Observance of canonical form (i.e., marrying before a qualified priest and witnesses).
If any of these elements is missing or gravely flawed, the marriage is null from the start, even if the parties are unaware.
3. History of nullity in the Church: Mercy and truth through the ages
From the earliest centuries, the Church recognized that not all seemingly valid marriages were actually valid. As early as the 4th century, St. Ambrose and St. Augustine wrote about situations where the bond could be considered nonexistent.
Over time, Canon Law defined clear criteria to discern the validity of marriage. It is neither a modern invention nor a concession to today’s culture of disposability, but a practice deeply rooted in Tradition.
The Council of Trent (16th century), the Code of Canon Law (especially the 1983 Code), and recent documents like Dignitas Connubii or the reforms of Pope Francis (Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, 2015), show a pastoral and doctrinal continuity, always seeking to protect the truth of marriage and the dignity of persons.
4. Common causes of nullity: When is a marriage invalid?
The causes of nullity fall into three major categories:
A. Defects of consent
- Serious immaturity to assume marital obligations.
- Grave fear or external pressure that annuls freedom.
- Grave ignorance about what marriage is.
- Simulation (entering marriage while faking, without intending the real marital commitment).
- Deliberate exclusion of fidelity, indissolubility, or openness to life.
B. Canonical impediments (cf. CIC, cc. 1083–1094)
- A prior undissolved marriage.
- Permanent impotence.
- Close blood relationship.
- Disparity of cult (if no dispensation is granted).
- Insufficient age, etc.
C. Lack of canonical form
- Marriages conducted outside the Church without dispensation.
- Lack of witnesses or qualified minister.
5. How to request a nullity? A step-by-step practical guide
Nullity is not an automatic or immediate process, but neither is it inaccessible. Here is a clear summary:
Step 1: Approach a trusted priest or the local ecclesiastical tribunal
- Explain the case.
- Receive initial guidance on its viability.
Step 2: File the petition
- With the help of a canon lawyer (many dioceses offer free counseling).
- Clearly explain the reasons why one believes the marriage was null.
Step 3: Instruction of the case
- Evidence is gathered: testimonies, documents, psychological assessments (if needed).
- Both parties are heard.
Step 4: Verdict
- The tribunal evaluates everything and issues a ruling. If nullity is declared, the bond is considered nonexistent.
Step 5: Possibility of remarriage
- Once nullity is recognized, the person may validly remarry in the Church, provided no new impediments exist.
6. What if there is no nullity? Living fidelity through pain
Nullity is not always possible or appropriate. When the marriage was valid, even if civilly ended, the bond remains. The Church then asks the individual to live fidelity within separation, especially if a new union cannot be regularized.
This is a path of cross and hope, but also of grace and spiritual fruitfulness, heroically lived by many.
“Let each of you remain in the condition in which he was called” (1 Cor 7:20).
Fidelity amid suffering is a prophetic witness.
7. Pastoral accompaniment: A look of mercy
Pope Francis has emphasized a Church that does not condemn but accompanies. Discernment, guided by truth, must always be accompanied by pastoral charity.
The faithful going through irregular marital situations must be welcomed with tenderness, listened to with respect, and guided with prudence, helping them to approach the sacraments when possible, or to live a committed Christian life within their current situation.
8. Frequently Asked Questions: To dispel myths and errors
Is nullity just a disguised divorce?
No. The Church never breaks a valid bond. It merely recognizes that in some cases, such a bond never existed.
Is it easy to obtain a nullity?
It’s not easy, but it’s not impossible. It does not depend on money or influence, but on objective evidence. Truth is what matters.
What happens to the children of a marriage declared null?
Children remain legitimate. Nullity does not affect their dignity or rights.
Can a civilly married and separated person receive Communion?
It depends. If living in a new union outside of sacramental marriage, they may not receive Communion, unless living in continence as “brother and sister” (cf. Familiaris Consortio, 84). But they can and should take part in the life of the Church through prayer, charity, and formation.
9. Practical application: Living in truth and hope
Each faithful Christian can apply these truths to their own life:
- Discern well before marrying. Prepare spiritually, psychologically, and emotionally.
- Do not be afraid to seek the truth about your marital history. The truth heals.
- Accompany others with mercy, without judging, helping them walk toward Christ.
- Seek light in the Church, not in the world. Not everything legal is true.
- Trust in grace: even in loneliness or failure, Christ never abandons those who sincerely seek Him.
Conclusion: The truth will set you free (Jn 8:32)
Marriage nullity is not an escape route nor a modern concession, but an act of justice and charity that aims to free the soul from a false appearance, allowing it to live in Christ’s light. It is an act of courage, faith, and humility, both for those who request it and for those who recognize it.
Now more than ever, we need Christians who live truth with love, and love with truth. Who are unafraid to look at their life story in the light of the Gospel, and who find in the Church not a rigid institution, but a Mother who walks with them, teaches them, and heals them.
“Come to me, all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest” (Mt 11:28).
May Mary, Mother of True Love, intercede for all marriages—those that flourish and those that suffer. May she, the faithful Spouse, always guide us to her Son, who never abandons those who seek Him with a sincere heart.
How can it be that the children are not affected, remain legitimate and retain dignity and rights, when a nullification establishes that neither a bond nor a marriage existed between their parents? If the latter is true, then there is no difference in conception between nullified marital bonds and nonexistent bonds of unwed parents. Why would the children in one scenario be granted legitimacy and the other not, when the children are, in the eyes of the church, fruit of the same circumstances?
Furthermore, what does legitimacy imply? Illegitimacy?
We deeply appreciate your comment and your question, which addresses one of the most delicate and important issues in Canon Law: the well-being and dignity of children. It is a very understandable concern that arises from a desire for justice and coherence. Allow us to explain the Church’s stance and logic on this matter, which is simultaneously theological, legal, and pastoral.
Your question can be broken down into two fundamental parts:
Why are the children of a marriage declared null considered legitimate, if it is said the marriage never existed?
What do the terms “legitimacy” and “illegitimacy” imply in the light of the Catholic faith?
1. The Legitimacy of Children: A Presumption of Goodness in Favor of the Child
The key to understanding this apparent paradox lies in the legal and pastoral principle found in the Code of Canon Law (Canon 1137):
“Children conceived or born of a valid or putative marriage are legitimate.”
A putative marriage is one that was entered into in good faith (at least by one of the parties), but suffers from a defect in form or consent that renders it null. However, until that nullity is declared, it is considered valid in its external effects, especially concerning the children.
In its wisdom, the Church applies a presumption of legitimacy in favor of the children. This means that:
The innocent are protected: The child is always a completely innocent party in the circumstances of their parents. The Church never wants a child to bear the legal or social consequences of a defect in their parents’ matrimonial consent for which they were not at all responsible.
A distinction is made between the bond and its effects: The declaration of nullity specifically judges the existence of the conjugal bond between the two adults. It does not judge or invalidate the reality of the family that existed, much less the dignity of the children born of that union. The nullity states, “this specific conjugal bond was never properly formed,” but it does not say, “this family did not exist or its fruit (the children) is illegitimate.”
Difference from a mere natural union: You ask about the difference with the children of unmarried parents. The difference is not in the dignity of the child (which is identical and inviolable in both cases), but in the context of intention and common good in which the child was conceived. The putative marriage, even if later declared null, was begun with the intention and public appearance of being a valid and perpetual commitment. Society and the Church recognized it as such. By declaring its nullity, the Church rectifies a past error regarding the bond, but it does not erase the good faith and original intention that surrounded the conception of the children, and that is why it protects them with the status of legitimacy.
2. The Meaning of “Legitimacy” and “Illegitimacy”
It is crucial to clarify these terms, which can sound harsh and outdated.
Legitimacy (in Canon Law): It is a legal status that grants specific rights within the ecclesial community (such as being considered the child of Catholics for purposes of registration in parish records, etc.). It is NOT a statement about the moral dignity or worth of the person. A “legitimate” child is not morally “better” than an “illegitimate” one.
Illegitimacy (in Canon Law): It is the lack of that specific legal status for not having been conceived within a valid or putative marriage. It is ALSO NOT a statement about the moral dignity or worth of the person.
The central and unchanging teaching of the Church is that EVERY child, born inside or outside of marriage, within a putative union or a casual relationship, possesses immense, sacred, and inviolable dignity by the mere fact of being a child of God, created in His image and likeness. Canonical legitimacy is a legal tool of protection, not a medal of moral honor.
Pastoral Conclusion
In summary, the apparent contradiction is resolved by understanding that the Church operates on two levels:
The Level of Truth about the Bond: It declares the truth about the relationship between the adults (the marriage was null from the start).
The Level of Protecting the Vulnerable: It applies the principle of charity and justice to protect the most vulnerable and innocent: the children. This is why it presumes their legitimacy when there was at least the public appearance and intention of a valid marriage.
The purpose of a declaration of nullity is not to stigmatize anyone, but to free people to live in the truth and, if they so wish, to regularize their situation before God and the Church, often allowing for a new sacramental union. And on this path of seeking the truth, children are never considered a “mistake,” but always a blessing whose dignity and rights must be safeguarded above all else.
We hope this explanation helps to clarify your doubt. We remain at your disposal to continue delving into this or any other topic.
Sincerely, catholicus.eu